https://www.gallup.com/cliftonstrengths/en/250133/compare-mbti-myers-briggs-cliftonstrengths.aspx
已故盖洛普资深科学家菲尔·斯通，哈佛大学前任心理学教授，研究了 MBTI 和 克利夫顿StrengthsFinder（04d.盖洛普-克里夫顿优势）之间的关系。斯通过他的206个学生进行了这两项完整的评估。研究表明两者之间的评估某些预期的相关性。
例如，如果克利夫顿StrengthsFinder显示，“分析”是你五大主题之一，MBTI第三维度你就可能属于内倾思考（Ti）或者外倾思考（Te）。如果体谅是你的五大主题之一，你MBTI第二维度很可能是感觉型（Fi 或 Fe）。同样，如果你有纪律，你就可能是MBTI第四维度是判断型（J）。
斯通的学生反馈克利夫顿 StrengthsFinder既更适用，比 MBTI更准确。
打个比方：想象一下，一个房子有好几个的房间。 MBTI表示，其中一个是最舒适的居住的房间。克利夫顿StrengthsFinder则代表的家具，设备，装饰，房间内的其他细节，从而帮助我们理解个人独特的天生的能力。无论是MBTI和克利夫顿StrengthsFinder都能揭示个性有价值的信息，都可以帮助个人与组织的战略发展。
原文：
Gallup Senior Scientist Phil Stone, a psychology professor at Harvard, examined the relationship between Myers-Briggs and the CliftonStrengths assessment. Stone had 206 of his students complete assessments through both instruments. The study showed some expected correlations between the two assessments. For example, if the CliftonStrengths assessment shows that Analytical is one of your Top 5 areas of talent, MBTI is likely to identify you as Thinking. If Empathy is in your Top 5 (CliftonStrengths), you are likely to be Feeling (MBTI). Likewise, if Discipline is in your Top 5 (CliftonStrengths), you’re probably also Judging (MBTI). Stone’s work depicts the accuracy of the two assessments for defining a person’s innate natural thoughts, feelings and behaviors.
Now let’s take a closer look at the applicability of each. Imagine a house and the rooms within it. MBTI indicates the room in which an individual is most comfortable residing. The CliftonStrengths assessment represents the furnishings, functional pieces, decorations and other details inside that room, helping us understand the individual’s unique innate abilities. Said differently, MBTI is the ZIP code, and CliftonStrengths puts you in front of the door.
